Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Naho Sato vs Anita Wagner Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sato vs Wagner analysis and find out who is favored!
Naho Sato vs Anita Wagner Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sato 1 - 0 Wagner
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sato has won 49.77% of points on their second serve, while Wagner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sato, in recent form, has won 57.29% of their opponent's second serve points, while Wagner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.97% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sato has saved 57.22% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wagner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sato has won 60.92% of matches played (W/L 53/ 34), with Wagner winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sato has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 35/ 16), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Wagner has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 59/ 51), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 4/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Sato has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.54% of matches (W/L 48/ 34), where as Wagner has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sato winning 1 times and Wagner being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Sato winning 2 and Wagner winning 0. The last match between Sato and Wagner was at the W60 Biarritz, 12-06-2023, Q1 round, Clay with Naho Sato getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sato and Wagner have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sato winning 0 times and Wagner 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sato winning 0, and Wagner 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sato has played against opponents with an average rank of 323.92 while Wagner has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sato has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wagner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sato has converted 50.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wagner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
332
Rank
328
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
882
Rank
633
High
29
Age
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
62% (153-92)
Career Total W/L
48% (168-184)
67% (35-17)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Naho Sato vs Anita Wagner For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Sato VS Wagner
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Naho Sato | Anita Wagner |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:0 | 1:28:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (37/60) | 48% (23/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (24/37) | 52% (12/23) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (12/23) | 28% (7/25) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Points W% | 60% (29/48) | 40% (24/60) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Naho Sato
Player
Anita Wagner
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Naho Sato | Anita Wagner |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (35/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (76/43) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (587/475) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 69% (34/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.07 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 35 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 139 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:4 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 351.48 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (2066/3312) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (1282/2066) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (622/1246) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 51% (221/437) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1624/3444) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (30/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 100% (5/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (35/52) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 89% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 60% (9/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 87% (31/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (31/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 38% (21/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Naho Sato Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Hanna Chang
Player
Naho Sato
48%
(
24 of
50)
1st Serve %
74%
(
52 of
70)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Kyoka Okamura
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Eunhye Lee
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
33 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Anastasia Gasanova
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
8
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
30 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Zhao
Player
Naho Sato
71%
(
84 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
-
Aces
-
10
Double Faults
5
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
29%
(
10 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
63%
(
10 of
16)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
59 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
54 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
108
|
7-5 6-7(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Sarah Beth Grey
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
52%
(
31 of
60)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Petra Hule
Player
Naho Sato
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Eri Shimizu
Player
Naho Sato
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
33 of
51)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ena Shibahara
Player
Naho Sato
50%
(
22 of
44)
1st Serve %
82%
(
40 of
49)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Haruna Arakawa
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
53 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
75
|
2-6 6-0 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Anita Wagner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Naho Sato
Player
Anita Wagner
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
24 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emeline Dartron
Player
Anita Wagner
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
40%
(
19 of
48)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diletta Cherubini
Player
Anita Wagner
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
49%
(
18 of
37)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Enola Chiesa
Player
Anita Wagner
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
67)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
3
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
48%
(
36 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-2 14-12 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Mona Barthel
Player
Anita Wagner
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
6
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
2
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anita Wagner
Player
Daria Yesypchuk
37%
(
15 of
41)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
77%
(
20 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anita Wagner
Player
Olivia Thiemke
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
68
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maria Bondarenko
Player
Anita Wagner
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
13 of
23)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
46%
(
17 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
44
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anita Wagner
Player
Alyssa Reguer
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
27 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
5-7 6-2 10-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Sato Vs Wagner Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Sato are available here and Wagner photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
